When
I decided to Google “Heroin epidemic,” I got about 1,440,000 results.
Five of these results were:
Lerner, S. & Stamp N. (2014, May 16). When heroin use hit the suburbs, everything changed. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com
McCrabb, R. (2015, January 17). Heroin epidemic escalating. Dayton Daily News. Retrieved from http://www.daytondailynews.com
Pannell, I. (2014, March 21). The horrific toll of America’s heroin ‘epidemic’. BBC. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com
Potter, M. (2014, September 6). How heroin flows over the border and into suburbia. NBC News. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com
Sullum, J. (2014, June 6). Schumer’s $100 million cure for the heroin ‘epidemic’ is snake oil. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com
(Sorry for the formatting, it wouldn't correctly format as a bibliography)
The three main themes that I have observed about the “heroin epidemic” from all of these sources is that heroin use is most prominent in a certain demographic, heroin has, especially recently, become cheaper and easier to obtain, and that, as a result, heroin usage has become especially pervasive in the past few years.
The three main themes that I have observed about the “heroin epidemic” from all of these sources is that heroin use is most prominent in a certain demographic, heroin has, especially recently, become cheaper and easier to obtain, and that, as a result, heroin usage has become especially pervasive in the past few years.
The first theme is that heroin has a
specific demographic that uses it: the white suburban middle class, and in
particular, teenagers. I think that this
theme is valid to the drug, as this provides information about the group most
likely to use heroin. However, creating
a theory that a certain demographic uses a certain drug excludes other groups
of users, and rather than focusing on everyone that needs help, people tend to
only focus on helping the main demographic of people. So, statistically, it is helpful to figure
out the main users of the drug, but I think that realistically, no one should
be excluded so they have an equal chance to receive help. Another theme is that heroin has become
cheaper to buy and easier to obtain especially in comparison to other
problematic drugs, specifically prescription drugs. I definitely think that this theme is
appropriate, because when a drug is cheaper and easier to obtain (from a drug
dealer rather than trying to get a doctor to give a prescription, for example),
more people will not only have the ability to get the drug, but will be more
willing to get the drug, which has definitely been a pushing factor in the
recent “epidemic”. The final theme is
that heroin usage has become much more pervasive in the past couple of years,
and I definitely think that this theme is valid. The articles all seem to say that usage of
heroin has surged suddenly in the past couple of years, and as more and more
people get addicted, public resources have been getting overwhelmed. Counseling centers have had month-long
waitlists and there have been shortages of the overdose counter-drug. Usage of heroin has clearly boomed much
faster than expected, and public services are currently scrambling to catch up,
showing just how quickly heroin usage became a major problem in society.
While I did not realize it before
starting this project, I definitely think that the heroin problem in the US can
be considered to be an epidemic. Its
usage has increased so dramatically in the past couple years, especially in the
younger generation, which makes it very apparent that it is a very popular drug
in the drug-using community. Also, the
fact that heroin users are using public support resources faster than these
resources can be replenished shows that there is definitely an epidemic of
sorts in society. As long as these
sources are being used faster than they can be provided, the problem will not
be able to be controlled, if even slowed.
I think that the media labels recent
usage of heroin as an epidemic because, first of all, the media is out to make
a business. They want to be
overly-dramatic about current events in order to get people to read their
stories. Using such a serious-sounding
word catches attention and convinces people to read the article. However, heroin usage does seem to
increasingly be a problem in the US, and by directing public attention to the
problem as an epidemic, the media can begin encouraging society, both the
lawmakers and citizens, to make a change for the better to help people out of
the draw of heroin.
What I found relates to class material
in many ways. First of all, and most
notably, the “heroin epidemic” brings up the debate of addiction to a certain
substance. Heroin is a highly addictive
substance, and many times, people even said that they were not just addicted to
the drug, but they actually depended on it; they would even steal from innocent
people to get money for their next fix of heroin. People are ruining their lives over this drug,
and in some cases, they take too much at a time or mix drugs and die from the
overdose. It is not a habit that can
just be quit, and a lot of time and perseverance must be used to escape the
addiction. It also relates to the class
because it can be seen how the government is trying to intervene with heroin
usage. It is a Schedule I drug, so it is
not allowed in any context. As such, the
police are trying to crack down on heroin users and dealers alike in order to
try to keep this drug off of the streets, though it can be seen where the
struggle comes in between trying to enforce the law and trying to look out for
the best of the citizens through rehabilitation.
No comments:
Post a Comment